安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题
That's what the comment section is for; to relay information about the maps pros and cons. Most people think it is there to log specifically who likes their maps. That offers nothing. I mostly focus on the cons because it's just hard to ignore what people don't realise Portal 2 can do if you don't design your maps carefully.
There's a difference between a douche and a critic. A douche will just spread hate without regard to human decency and provide nothing meaningful to the person they target ("I hate it"). A critic will point out the flaws and try to offer a way to fix it ("I noticed you can bypass this section so do this so future players can't bypass it").
Read that you are a "critic" of portal maps. I like to exploit and comment on maps aswell, but I feel that people may find it very annoying to have all the ´flawes of the chamber pointed out by some douche.. maybe I will start to comment on every map though...
The antlines aren't messy? Why do you think so?
Fun test, refreshing break from all the "ultimate challenges" on the workshop that make my head hurt.