Zainstaluj Steam
zaloguj się
|
język
简体中文 (chiński uproszczony)
繁體中文 (chiński tradycyjny)
日本語 (japoński)
한국어 (koreański)
ไทย (tajski)
български (bułgarski)
Čeština (czeski)
Dansk (duński)
Deutsch (niemiecki)
English (angielski)
Español – España (hiszpański)
Español – Latinoamérica (hiszpański latynoamerykański)
Ελληνικά (grecki)
Français (francuski)
Italiano (włoski)
Bahasa Indonesia (indonezyjski)
Magyar (węgierski)
Nederlands (niderlandzki)
Norsk (norweski)
Português (portugalski – Portugalia)
Português – Brasil (portugalski brazylijski)
Română (rumuński)
Русский (rosyjski)
Suomi (fiński)
Svenska (szwedzki)
Türkçe (turecki)
Tiếng Việt (wietnamski)
Українська (ukraiński)
Zgłoś problem z tłumaczeniem
That's what the comment section is for; to relay information about the maps pros and cons. Most people think it is there to log specifically who likes their maps. That offers nothing. I mostly focus on the cons because it's just hard to ignore what people don't realise Portal 2 can do if you don't design your maps carefully.
There's a difference between a douche and a critic. A douche will just spread hate without regard to human decency and provide nothing meaningful to the person they target ("I hate it"). A critic will point out the flaws and try to offer a way to fix it ("I noticed you can bypass this section so do this so future players can't bypass it").
Read that you are a "critic" of portal maps. I like to exploit and comment on maps aswell, but I feel that people may find it very annoying to have all the ´flawes of the chamber pointed out by some douche.. maybe I will start to comment on every map though...
The antlines aren't messy? Why do you think so?
Fun test, refreshing break from all the "ultimate challenges" on the workshop that make my head hurt.