Steamをインストール
ログイン
|
言語
简体中文(簡体字中国語)
繁體中文(繁体字中国語)
한국어 (韓国語)
ไทย (タイ語)
български (ブルガリア語)
Čeština(チェコ語)
Dansk (デンマーク語)
Deutsch (ドイツ語)
English (英語)
Español - España (スペイン語 - スペイン)
Español - Latinoamérica (スペイン語 - ラテンアメリカ)
Ελληνικά (ギリシャ語)
Français (フランス語)
Italiano (イタリア語)
Bahasa Indonesia(インドネシア語)
Magyar(ハンガリー語)
Nederlands (オランダ語)
Norsk (ノルウェー語)
Polski (ポーランド語)
Português(ポルトガル語-ポルトガル)
Português - Brasil (ポルトガル語 - ブラジル)
Română(ルーマニア語)
Русский (ロシア語)
Suomi (フィンランド語)
Svenska (スウェーデン語)
Türkçe (トルコ語)
Tiếng Việt (ベトナム語)
Українська (ウクライナ語)
翻訳の問題を報告
That's what the comment section is for; to relay information about the maps pros and cons. Most people think it is there to log specifically who likes their maps. That offers nothing. I mostly focus on the cons because it's just hard to ignore what people don't realise Portal 2 can do if you don't design your maps carefully.
There's a difference between a douche and a critic. A douche will just spread hate without regard to human decency and provide nothing meaningful to the person they target ("I hate it"). A critic will point out the flaws and try to offer a way to fix it ("I noticed you can bypass this section so do this so future players can't bypass it").
Read that you are a "critic" of portal maps. I like to exploit and comment on maps aswell, but I feel that people may find it very annoying to have all the ´flawes of the chamber pointed out by some douche.. maybe I will start to comment on every map though...
The antlines aren't messy? Why do you think so?
Fun test, refreshing break from all the "ultimate challenges" on the workshop that make my head hurt.